Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38485670›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2025

From Promise to Practice: How Health Researchers Understand and Promote Transdisciplinary Collaboration.

Michael T Lawless, Matthew Tieu, Mandy M Archibald, Maria Alejandra Pinero De Plaza, Alison L Kitson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Learning in a contextually complex rural clinical placement.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A complexity theory-informed COPC approach to evaluation of mining health programmes.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Michael T LawlessCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2536-6442
Matthew TieuCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Mandy M ArchibaldCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Maria Alejandra Pinero De PlazaCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5421-9604
Alison L KitsonCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Flinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing emphasis on transdisciplinary research to address the complex challenges faced by health systems. However, research has not adequately explored how members of transdisciplinary research teams perceive, understand, and promote transdisciplinary collaboration. As such, there is a need to investigate collaborative behaviors, knowledge, and the impacts of transdisciplinary research. To address this gap, we conducted a longitudinal realist evaluation of transdisciplinary collaboration within a 5-year National Health and Medical Research Council-funded Center of Research Excellence in Transdisciplinary Frailty Research. The current study aimed to explore researchers' perceptions and promotion of transdisciplinary research specifically within the context of frailty research using qualitative methods. Participants described transdisciplinary research as a collaborative and integrative approach that involves individuals from various disciplines working together to tackle complex research problems. However, participants often used terms like interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary interchangeably, indicating that a shared understanding of transdisciplinary research is needed. Barriers to transdisciplinary collaboration included time constraints, geographical distance, and entrenched collaboration patterns. To overcome these challenges, participants suggested implementing strategies such as creating a shared vision and goals, establishing appropriate collaboration systems and structures, and role modeling collaborative behaviors, values, and attitudes. Our findings underscore the need for practical knowledge in developing transdisciplinary collaboration and leadership skills across different career stages. In the absence of formal training, sustained and immersive programs that connect researchers with peers, educators, and role models from various disciplines and provide experiential learning opportunities, may be valuable in fostering successful transdisciplinary collaboration.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterdisciplinary ResearchResearch PersonnelFemaleHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationLongitudinal StudiesMaleQualitative Researchcollaborationknowledge translationqualitativetransdisciplinarytranslational health research

Identifiers

PMID38485670
PMCPMC11626853
OpenAlexW4392861085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.