ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2024
Compatibility versus reaction diffusion: Factors that determine the heterogeneity of polymerized adhesive networks.
Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing dentin bonding with catechol-based monomers by tailoring photoinitiator systems to overcome radical inhibition.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Micro-CT Assessment of Radiopacity and Intra-Cavity Distribution of Universal Adhesives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improvement of dentin bonding via adhesive monomers with multiple hydrogen bonding moieties.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesHeterogeneity and phase separation during network polymerization is a major issue contributing to the failure of dental adhesives. This study investigates how the ratio of hydrophobic crosslinkers to hydrophilic comonomer (C/H ratio), as well as cosolvent fraction (ethanol/water) influences the degree of heterogeneity and proclivity for phase separation in a series of model adhesive formulations.
methodsTwelve formulations were investigated, with 4 different C/H ratios (7:1, 2.2:1, 1:1, 0.5:1) and 3 different overall cosolvent fractions (0, 10 and 20 wt%). The heterogeneity and phase behavior were characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) and atomic force microscopy (AFM).
resultsIn resins without cosolvent, all characterizations confirm reduced heterogeneity as C/H ratio decreases. However, when 10 or 20 wt% of cosolvent is included in the adhesive formulation, a higher degree of heterogeneity and even distinct phase separation with domains ranging from a few hundreds of nanometers to a few micrometers in size form. This is particularly noticeable at lower C/H ratios, which is surprising as HEMA is commonly considered a compatibilizer between hydrophobic crosslinkers and aqueous (co)solvents. SIGNIFICANCE: Our experiments demonstrate that formulations with lower C/H ratio and thus a lower viscosity experience later onsets of diffusion limitations during polymerization, which favors thermodynamically driven phase separation. Therefore, to determine or predict the resulting phase structure of adhesive materials, it is necessary to consider the kinetics and diffusion constraints during the formation of the polymer network and not just the compatibility of resin constituents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.