ArticlePancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]2024
Exploring the enigmatic association between PNLIP variants and risk of chronic pancreatitis in a large Chinese cohort.
Article in Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and preliminary clinical validation of type 2 diabetes signature genes through machine learning analysis of scRNA-seq data.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Characterization of a PNLIP variant identified in Amish pediatric patients with congenital pancreatic lipase deficiency.Journal of lipid research · 2025Article
- The Effects of Da-Chai-Hu Decoction Alleviating Pancreatic Exocrine Dysfunction by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress of Acinar Cell in Mice with Chronic Pancreatitis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- SEC16A Variants Predispose to Chronic Pancreatitis by Impairing ER-to-Golgi Transport and Inducing ER Stress.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsProtease-sensitive PNLIP variants were recently associated with chronic pancreatitis (CP) in European populations. The pathological mechanism yet remains elusive. Herein, we performed a comprehensive genetic and functional analysis of PNLIP variants found in a large Chinese cohort, aiming to further unravel the enigmatic association of PNLIP variants with CP.
methodsAll coding and flanking intronic regions of the PNLIP gene were analyzed for rare variants by targeted next-generation sequencing in 1082 Chinese CP patients and 1196 controls. All novel missense variants were subject to analysis of secretion, lipase activity, and proteolytic degradation. One variant was further analyzed for its potential to misfold and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. p.F300L, the most common PNLIP variant associated with CP, was used as a control.
resultsWe identified 12 rare heterozygous PNLIP variants, with 10 being novel. The variant carrier frequency did not differ between the groups. Of them, only the variant p.A433T found in a single patient was considered pathologically relevant. p.A433T exhibited increased susceptibility to proteolytic degradation, which was much milder than p.F300L. Interestingly, both variants exhibited an increased tendency to misfold, leading to intracellular retention as insoluble aggregates, reduced secretion, and elevated ER stress.
conclusionsOur genetic and functional analysis of PNLIP variants identified in a Chinese CP cohort suggests that the p.A433T variant and the previously identified p.F300L variant are not only protease-sensitive but also may be potentially proteotoxic. Mouse studies of the PNLIP p.F300L and p.A433T variants are needed to clarify their role in CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.