Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38485177›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Comparison of ultrasound-guided subtransverse process interligamentary plane block with paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery: protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Wei Wu, Danyang Wang, Yang Liu, Tianyi Zhu, Wenxin He, Hong Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei Wu *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8001-153X
Danyang Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Tianyi ZhuSchool of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Wenxin HeDepartment of Thoracic surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China 13651958255@139.com 0wenxinhe@tongji.edu.cn.
Hong ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China 13651958255@139.com 0wenxinhe@tongji.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-0182-8729
Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe subtransverse process interligamentary (STIL) plane block is an emerging interfascial plane block that has garnered attention for its potential to provide effective postoperative analgesia for breast and thoracic surgeries. However, a direct comparative assessment between the STIL plane block and the paravertebral block is currently lacking. Consequently, our study aims to assess the analgesic efficacy of the STIL block in comparison to paravertebral block for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a randomised, parallel-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, with the goal of enrolling 114 participants scheduled for uniportal VATS at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio through block randomisation to receive either the STIL plane block (n=57) or the paravertebral block (n=57). The primary outcome of the study is the area under the curve of Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) scores recorded over a 48-hour period following the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes encompass the evaluation of Quality of Recovery-40, cumulative sufentanil consumption, serum inflammatory factors, rescue medication usage, the incidence of adverse events and the patient satisfaction scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (approval no. L22-329). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200066909.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaNerve BlockPostoperative PainThoracic SurgeryAnalgesics, OpioidChinaEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansUltrasonography, InterventionalAnalgesics, OpioidAdult anaesthesiaCardiothoracic surgeryPain managementPatients

Identifiers

PMID38485177
PMCPMC10941127
OpenAlexW4392814480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.