Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38485169›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2024

Investigating patient engagement associations between a postdischarge texting programme and patient experience, readmission and revisit rates outcomes.

Courtenay Bruce, Theresa Pinn-Kirkland, Adam Meyers, Emmanuel Javaluyas, John Osborn, Sayali Kelkar, Lindsey Bruchhaus, Kristen McLaury, Katherine Sauceda, Karen Carr and 7 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Courtenay BruceSystem Patient Experience, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA crbruce@houstonmethodist.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9503-9834
Theresa Pinn-KirklandHouston Methodist Physicians Alliance for Quality, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
Adam MeyersHouston Methodist Physician Organization, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
Emmanuel JavaluyasDepartment of Nursing, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
John OsbornSystem Quality & Patient Safety, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sayali KelkarSystem Quality & Patient Safety, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
Lindsey BruchhausDepartment of Guest Relations and Patient Experience, Houston Methodist The Woodlands, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
Kristen McLauryDepartment of Guest Relations and Patient Experience, Houston Methodist The Woodlands, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
Katherine SaucedaDepartment of Guest Relations and Patient Experience, Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital, Sugar Land, Texas, USA.
Karen CarrDepartment of Guest Relations and Patient Experience, Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital, Sugar Land, Texas, USA.
Claudia GarciaDepartment of Guest Relations and Patient Experience, Houston Methodist Baytown, Houston, Texas, USA.
Lee Ann ArabieHouston Methodist Clear Lake, Houston, Texas, USA.
Terrell WilliamsSystem Patient Experience, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gail VozzellaDepartment of Nursing, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
Tariq NisarCenter for Health Data Science & Analytics, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
Roberta L SchwartzHouston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
Farzan SasangoharIndustrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9962-5470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed (1) to examine the association between patient engagement with a bidirectional, semiautomated postdischarge texting programme and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey outcomes, readmissions and revisit rates in a large health system and (2) to describe operational and clinical flow considerations for implementing a postdischarge texting programme.

settingThe study involved 1 main academic hospital (beds: 2500+) and 6 community hospitals (beds: 190-400, averaging 300 beds per hospital) in Houston, Texas.

methodsRetrospective, observational cohort study between non-engaged patients (responded with 0-2 incoming text messages) and engaged patients (responded with 3+ incoming, patient-initiated text messages) between December 2022 and May 2023. We used the two-tailed t-test for continuous variables and χ

resultsFrom 78 883 patients who were contacted over the course of this pilot implementation, 49 222 (62.4%) responded, with 39 442 (50%) responded with 3+ incoming text messages. The engaged cohort had higher HCAHPS scores in all domains compared with the non-engaged cohort. The engaged cohort used significantly fewer 30-day acute care resources, experiencing 29% fewer overall readmissions and 20% fewer revisit rates (23% less likely to revisit) and were 27% less likely to be readmitted. The results were statistically significant for all but two hospitals.

conclusionsThis study builds on the few postdischarge texting studies, and also builds on the patient engagement literature, finding that patient engagement with postdischarge texting can be associated with fewer acute care resources. To our knowledge, this is the only study that documented an association between a text-based postdischarge programme and HCAHPS scores, perhaps owing to the bidirectionality and ease with which patients could interact with nurses. Future research should explore the texting paradigms to evaluate their associated outcomes in a variety of postdischarge applications.

Indexed as

Patient ReadmissionText MessagingAftercareHospitals, CommunityHumansPatient DischargePatient Outcome AssessmentPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesPatient-Centered CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38485169
PMCPMC10941103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.