Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38484713›Full record

ReviewMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2024

Diagnostic Methods for Helicobacter pylori.

Liana Cristina Melo Carneiro Costa, Maria das Graças Carvalho, Ana Cristina La Guárdia Custódio Pereira, Rafael Gonçalves Teixeira Neto, Lívia Carolina Andrade Figueiredo, Melina Barros-Pinheiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and risk factors ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Pathologic Profiles ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liana Cristina Melo Carneiro CostaCampus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Divinópolis, Brazil.
Maria das Graças CarvalhoDepartamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas da Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ana Cristina La Guárdia Custódio PereiraCampus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Divinópolis, Brazil.
Rafael Gonçalves Teixeira NetoCampus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Divinópolis, Brazil.
Lívia Carolina Andrade FigueiredoCampus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Divinópolis, Brazil.
Melina Barros-PinheiroCampus Centro-Oeste Dona Lindu, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Divinópolis, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori infection is a significant global health concern. It cannot be diagnosed based solely on the patient's medical history and symptoms, and laboratory and imaging tests are often required to confirm the diagnosis. Both noninvasive and invasive methods are available for diagnosing H. pylori infection, including conventional and advanced detection techniques. It is not uncommon for patients to present with false-negative results due to the use of inadequate investigation methodologies, which prevents the adoption of appropriate clinical management. Thus, an analysis of the literature regarding the methods of diagnosis of H. pylori, with its advantages and disadvantages, is necessary. Publications in specialized scientific journals will undoubtedly contribute to facilitating access by professionals interested in the topic providing greater knowledge and potentially clinically useful guidance. In this review, the authors have sought to analyze and summarize the invasive and noninvasive methods, their applications, limitations, and the conditions that affect the sensitivity of the tests used for diagnosing H. pylori, an essential step for the successful treatment of this infection. It is essential to treat all patients infected with H. pylori. This represents a significant change in the approach, as the treatment was recommended previously only for patients showing symptoms of infection. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the limitations of traditional diagnostic methods and help raise awareness among healthcare professionals about the latest advances in diagnosing this important bacterium.

Indexed as

Helicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriBreath TestsHumansSensitivity and SpecificityDiagnostic testHelicobacter infectionsHelicobacter pylori

Identifiers

PMID38484713
PMCPMC11175606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.