Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38484529›Full record

SynthesisThe International journal on drug policy2024

Punitive legal responses to prenatal drug use in the United States: A survey of state policies and systematic review of their public health impacts.

Emilie Bruzelius, Kristen Underhill, Melanie S Askari, Sandhya Kajeepeta, Lisa Bates, Seth J Prins, Marian Jarlenski, Silvia S Martins

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The International journal on drug policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
36.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of Opioid Misuse and Abuse Among Pregnant Women in the US.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impact of substance use and trauma on postpartum readmission rates and hospitalization costs: An observational study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie BruzeliusDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: eb2674@cumc.columbia.edu.
Kristen UnderhillCornell University Law School, 306 Myron Taylor Hall Ithaca, NY 14853-4901, USA.
Melanie S AskariDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA.
Sandhya KajeepetaDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA.
Lisa BatesDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA.
Seth J PrinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA.
Marian JarlenskiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, A619 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Silvia S MartinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722W. 168th St. New York, NY 10032, USA.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USCornell University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Substance Abuse Epidemiology Training Program (SAETP) at Columbia UniversityT32DA031099 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBORAH S HASIN, Silvia Saboia Martins · 2012 to 2026
$6.1M
Examining the Synergistic Effects of Cannabis and Prescription Opioid Policies on Chronic Pain, Opioid Prescribing, and Opioid OverdoseR01DA045872 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CERDA, MAGDALENA, MARTINS, SILVIA SABOIA · 2019 to 2023
$4.3M
State-level opioid policies and policies that regulate substance use duringpregnancy: a mixed methods exploration of their effects on maternal and infantoutcomesR01DA053745 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Silvia Saboia Martins, Morgan Mari Philbin · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045872NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA053745NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPunitive legal responses to prenatal drug use may be associated with unintended adverse health consequences. However, in a rapidly shifting policy climate, current information has not been summarized. We conducted a survey of U.S. state policies that utilize criminal or civil legal system penalties to address prenatal drug use. We then systematically identified empirical studies evaluating these policies and summarized their potential public health impacts.

methodsUsing existing databases and original statutory research, we surveyed current U.S. state-level prenatal drug use policies authorizing explicit criminalization, involuntary commitment, civil child abuse substantiation, and parental rights termination. Next, we systematically identified quantitative associations between these policies and health outcomes, restricting to U.S.-based peer-reviewed research, published January 2000-December 2022. Results described study characteristics and synthesized the evidence on health-related harms and benefits associated with punitive policies. Validity threats were described narratively.

resultsBy 2022, two states had adopted policies explicitly authorizing criminal prosecution, and five states allowed pregnancy-specific and drug use-related involuntary civil commitment. Prenatal drug use was grounds for substantiating civil child abuse and terminating parental rights in 22 and five states, respectively. Of the 16 review-identified articles, most evaluated associations between punitive policies generally (k = 12), or civil child abuse policies specifically (k = 2), and multiple outcomes, including drug treatment utilization (k = 6), maltreatment reporting and foster care entry (k = 5), neonatal drug withdrawal syndrome (NDWS, k = 4) and other pregnancy and birth-related outcomes (k = 3). Most included studies reported null associations or suggested increases in adverse outcome following punitive policy adoption.

conclusionsNearly half of U.S. states have adopted policies that respond to prenatal drug use with legal system penalties. While additional research is needed to clarify whether such approaches engender overt health harms, current evidence indicates that punitive policies are not associated with public health benefits, and therefore constitute ineffective policy.

Indexed as

Public HealthSubstance-Related DisordersCriminal LawFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesDrug treatmentNeonatal drug withdrawal syndromePolicy analysisPrenatal substance use

Identifiers

PMID38484529
PMCPMC11056296
OpenAlexW4392825791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.