Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38484377›Full record

ReviewMagyar onkologia2024

[Systemic treatment of adult gliomas: a narrative review].

László Mangel

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Magyar onkologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

László MangelKlinikai Központ, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Onkoterápiás Intézet, Pécs, Hungary. mangel.laszlo@pte.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are considered as locally aggressive diseases, consequently, surgery and radiotherapy are the basic therapies of the glial tumors. Nevertheless, the long-term ineffectiveness of the local treatment modalities and the frequently observed relapses explain the unmet medical need for the elaboration of effective systemic treatment regimes. In the last few decades of the 20th century, the use of different chemotherapeutic agents and their combinations, and the alternative administration of drugs have been in the therapeutic forefront of gliomas, whereas, later, in the first years of this century temozolomide was introduced to the everyday clinical practice as the most effective "anti-glioma" medicine, and it is still widely used both in monotherapy and in different combinations. Nevertheless, in the last two decades, considering the recognition of different predictive molecular markers, different targeted therapies, e.g. VEGFR inhibitor agents were also introduced into the routine clinical practice, and there have been promising results published in immunotherapy trials in the recent years, as well. Besides the promising results with the novel systemic therapies, it should be emphasized that both in the primary and the salvage care of the glial tumors the most effective treatment options are the individualized combinations of local and systemic treatment modalities, with the proper interpretation of brain imaging data and patient-centered clinical management.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaAdultHumansImmunotherapyTemozolomideTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID38484377
PMCPMC11870693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.