Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38484371›Full record

ArticleMagyar onkologia2024

[Intra- and perioperative imaging options in neurosurgery].

Loránd Erőss, László Halász, Gabriella Miklós

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Magyar onkologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Loránd ErőssOrszágos Mentális, Ideggyógyászati és Idegsebészeti Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. l.g.eross@gmail.com.
László HalászOrszágos Mentális, Ideggyógyászati és Idegsebészeti Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. l.g.eross@gmail.com.
Gabriella MiklósOrszágos Mentális, Ideggyógyászati és Idegsebészeti Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. l.g.eross@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of central nervous system tumors is still a major challenge for the oncological and neurosurgical teams. Due to the heterogeneous histological and topological characteristics of these neoplasms, every case requires individual evaluation. In addition to histology and stage, survival is largely determined by the extent of resection, which can be severely limited by the proximity of eloquent brain regions. A key component of current modern neuro-oncological care is the planning and execution of surgical intervention to ensure the longest possible progression-free survival with adequate quality of life. The simultaneous development of several pre- and intra-operative imaging modalities is making optimal therapy more and more accessible and safe. Structural, diffusion and functional MRI offers the possibility to visualize the tumor and the surrounding areas both before and during surgery. For the surgeon, the optimal intra-operative environment, orientation and visual acuity are provided by increasingly sophisticated microscopes, navigation devices, intra-operative imaging equipment, endo- and exoscopes.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeurosurgeryBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurosurgical ProceduresQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID38484371
PMCPMC11870703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.