ReviewCirculation research2024
Circadian Mechanisms in Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease.
Review in Circulation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circadian modulation of surgical timing and postoperative outcomes in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort analysis.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Sleep Duration Irregularity and Risk for Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the UK Biobank.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- The pathobiology of neurovascular aging.Neuron · 2025Review
- Misalignment Between Circadian Preference and Accelerometer-Derived Sleep-Wake Cycle With Increased Risk of Cardiometabolic Diseases.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.