Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38484008›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Determinants of intention to leave among nurses and physicians in a hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neeltje de Vries, Laura Maniscalco, Domenica Matranga, José Bouman, J Peter de Winter

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. From Crisis Response to Recovery: A Two-Wave Qualitative Study of Nursing Leadership Trajectories in Italy (2020-2025).Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Burnout in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Endoscopy international open · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neeltje de VriesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9779-9055
Laura ManiscalcoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, "G. D'Alessandro" (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Domenica MatrangaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, "G. D'Alessandro" (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2466-937X
José BoumanSpaarne Gasthuis Academy, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
J Peter de WinterSpaarne Gasthuis Academy, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8476-5312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global outbreak of COVID-19 has brought to light the profound impact that large-scale disease outbreaks can have on healthcare systems and the dedicated professionals who serve within them. It becomes increasingly important to explore strategies for retaining nurses and physicians within hospital settings during such challenging times. This paper aims to investigate the determinants of retention among nurses and physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodA systematic review of other potential determinants impacting retention rates during the pandemic was carried out. Secondly, a meta-analysis on the prevalence of intention to leave for nurses and physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.

findingsA comprehensive search was performed within four electronic databases on March 17 2023. Fifty-five papers were included in the systematic review, whereas thirty-three papers fulfilled the eligibility criteria for the meta-analysis. The systematic review resulted in six themes of determinants impacting intention to leave: personal characteristics, job demands, employment services, working conditions, work relationships, and organisational culture. The main determinants impacting the intention to leave are the fear of COVID-19, age, experience, burnout symptoms and support. Meta-analysis showed a prevalence of intent to leave the current job of 38% for nurses (95% CI: 26%-51%) and 29% for physicians (95% CI: 21%-39%), whereas intention to leave the profession for nurses 28% (95% CI: 21%-34%) and 24% for physicians (95% CI: 23%-25%).

conclusionThe findings of this paper showed the critical need for hospital managers to address the concerning increase in nurses' and physicians' intentions to leave during the COVID-19 pandemic. This intention to leave is affected by a complex conjunction of multiple determinants, including the fear of COVID-19 and the confidence in and availability of personal protective equipment. Moreover, individual factors like age, experience, burnout symptoms, and support are maintained in this review. Understanding the influence of determinants on retention during the COVID-19 pandemic offers an opportunity to formulate prospective strategies for retaining nurses and physicians within hospital settings.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19IntentionPandemicsPhysiciansHospitalsHumansJob SatisfactionNursesNursing Staff, HospitalPersonnel TurnoverSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38484008
PMCPMC10939201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.