Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483963›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

An efficient and cost-effective method for disrupting genes in RAW264.7 macrophages using CRISPR-Cas9.

Mohammad J Hossain, Tamara J O'Connor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad J HossainDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Tamara J O'ConnorDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2535-5820

Funding

Deciphering the role of peroxisomes in bacterial pathogenesisR01AI163273 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Tamara O'Connor · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Defining redundant strategies central to Legionella replication vacuole formationR01AI125402 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI O'CONNOR, TAMARA · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125402NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI163273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) are widely used for genome editing in cultured cell lines. However, the implementation of genome editing is still challenging due to the complex and often costly multi-step process associated with this technique. Moreover, the efficiency of genome editing varies across cell types, often limiting utility. Herein, we describe pCRISPR-EASY, a vector for simplified cloning of single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) and its simultaneous introduction with CRISPR-Cas9 into cultured cells using a non-viral delivery system. We outline a comprehensive, step-by-step protocol for genome editing in RAW264.7 macrophages, a mouse macrophage cell line widely used in biomedical research for which genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 has been restricted to lentiviral or expensive commercial reagents. This provides an economical, highly efficient and reliable method for genome editing that can easily be adapted for use in other systems.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsCells, CulturedCost-Benefit AnalysisGene EditingMiceRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID38483963
PMCPMC10939251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.