Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483847›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Radiographic Assessment of 121 Glass Fiber Post Procedures in 32 Patients Aged 21-60 Years Performed by 6th-Year Dental Students During the 2022-2023 Academic Year at the College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulkarim H Alshehri, Khalid Dhafer Alhendi, Raid Abdullah Almnea, Ahmed A Alelyani, Thrya S Gadah, Nasser M Al Ahmari, Abdulmajeed Saeed Alshahrani, Mohammed M Al Moaleem, Nezar Boreak, Abdulaziz Yahya Thubab

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abdulkarim H AlshehriDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Dhafer AlhendiDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Raid Abdullah AlmneaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed A AlelyaniDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Thrya S GadahProsthetic Department, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7213-2393
Nasser M Al AhmariProsthetic Department, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmajeed Saeed AlshahraniDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed M Al MoaleemDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-261X
Nezar BoreakDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz Yahya ThubabDental Intern, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Jazan University · SANajran University · SAKing Khalid University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) and severely damaged teeth has been a concern of clinicians. Glass Fiber Post (GFPs) combine the strength of carbon fiber posts with the esthetic appearance of glass to resemble natural dentin during dental restoration procedures. This radiographical study assessed the GFP carried out by students enrolled in the Clinical Comprehensive Course at the College of Dentistry, Jazan University. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 32 patients treated by 18 6th-year dental students with 121 GFPs were assessed in this cross-sectional radiographic study. The assessment covered tooth type, arch, post-to-root width, length of post in relation to the crown and root lengths, amount of remaining gutta percha (GP), and gap between GP and post. Data were analyzed using SPSS, and associations between variables were determined using the chi-square test. RESULTS Maxillary teeth were the most frequently restored with posts (88.4%) with most being (58.7%) anterior teeth, and 50.4% of posts had widths that were one-third that of the root. The percentage of posts was twice (71.1%) or equal to (26.4%) the crown length, whereas two-thirds of the tested GFPs were >5 mm of the remaining GP. Significant differences were observed in location and position of teeth with post width, post length in relation to crown or root length, and amount of remaining GP, with P values of 0.018, 0.000, and 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The assessed radiographs revealed that the performance of sixth year students in accomplishment GFP radiographically was satisfactory and within the values recommended in the literature.

Indexed as

Post and Core TechniqueTooth FracturesCross-Sectional StudiesDental Stress AnalysisGlassHumansSaudi ArabiaStudents, DentalUniversitiesfiberglass

Identifiers

PMID38483847
PMCPMC10949829
OpenAlexW4391211341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.