Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483785›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

Colorectal metastases with intrabiliary growth: incidence, treatment, and outcomes.

Serena Langella, Serena Armentano, Nadia Russolillo, Andrea-Pierre Luzzi, Andrea Pierluigi Fontana, Lorenzo Daniele, Alessandro Ferrero

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Serena LangellaDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano "Umberto I" Hospital, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy. slangella@mauriziano.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-0460
Serena ArmentanoDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano "Umberto I" Hospital, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
Nadia RussolilloDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano "Umberto I" Hospital, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
Andrea-Pierre LuzziDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano "Umberto I" Hospital, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
Andrea Pierluigi FontanaDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano "Umberto I" Hospital, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
Lorenzo DanieleDepartment of Patology, Mauriziano "Umberto I" Hospital, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro FerreroDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano "Umberto I" Hospital, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrabiliary growth (IG) is an unusual modality for colorectal metastases to spread. Relatively little is known about this condition because large series are lacking. The aim of the study was to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients with or without IG. From 01/2010 to 12/2020, 999 patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. Clinicopathological variables were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective-collected database of patients with or without IG. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis to compare OS and DFS was performed. At first hepatectomy, 29 patients (2.9%) had IG: 7 isolated IG and 22 mixed-type (mass-forming lesion with IG). 4 patients presented IG at repeat hepatectomy for recurrence, of whom 3 had no biliary invasion at initial surgery. IG resulted to be more common in older patients (median age 70 in IG vs 60 years of no-IG, p = 0.004). Mean time from colorectal tumor was longer in IG (20.4 months) than no-IG (12.9 months), p = 0.038. Major hepatectomies (55.2% IG vs 29.7% no-IG, p = 0.003) and anatomic resections (89.7% vs 58.2%, p = 0.001) were more frequently required to treat IG. In 5 (17%) of IG, a resection of main bile duct was performed. Overall postoperative mortality and complications were similar in the two groups, while bile leak was 17.2% IG vs 5.6% no-IG (p = 0.024). Median margin width was comparable in IG (1.4 mm) and no-IG (2 mm). Five-year overall survival (IG 45.9% vs no-IG 44.5%) and Disease-Free Survival (IG 35.9% vs no-IG 36.6%) were similar in the two groups. According to PSM, 145 patients with no-IG were compared to 29 of IG group. After PSM, OS and DFS did not show any statistically significant difference. IG has similar oncological outcomes of resected colorectal metastases without IG, although it affects surgical management.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsAgedHepatectomyHumansIncidenceProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesColorectal cancerComplicationsIntrabiliaryLiver metastasisLiver surgerySurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.