Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483609›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Socioeconomic position, family context, and child cognitive development.

Llúcia González, Maja Popovic, Marisa Rebagliato, Marisa Estarlich, Giovenale Moirano, Florencia Barreto-Zarza, Lorenzo Richiardi, Enrique Arranz, Loreto Santa-Marina, Daniela Zugna and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Llúcia GonzálezSpanish Consortium for Research On Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8246-0793
Maja PopovicCancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4500-6572
Marisa RebagliatoSpanish Consortium for Research On Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5825-0190
Marisa EstarlichSpanish Consortium for Research On Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. maeses@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-2663
Giovenale MoiranoCancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8748-3321
Florencia Barreto-ZarzaFaculty of Psychology, Department of Basic Psychological Processes and their development, HAEZI Research Group, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-7281
Lorenzo RichiardiCancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-9402
Enrique ArranzFaculty of Psychology, Department of Basic Psychological Processes and their development, HAEZI Research Group, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-3420
Loreto Santa-MarinaSpanish Consortium for Research On Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1405-9751
Daniela ZugnaCancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5122-6144
Jesús IbarluzeaSpanish Consortium for Research On Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6933-5373
Costanza PizziCancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4519-2822
Piedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITUniversity of the Basque Country · ESBasque Government · ESFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESUniversitat de València · ESUniversitat Jaume I · ES

Funding

Department of Health of the Basque Government 2005111093, 2009111069, 2013111089 and 2015111065European Union-Next Generation EU and the Ministerio de Universidades Margarita Salas Grant MS21-125Generalitat Valenciana AICO/2020/285; CIAICO/2021/132ISCIII Red INMA G03/176, CB06/02/0041; FIS-FEDER: PI06/0867, PI09/00090, PI11/02038, PI13/02187, PI16/1288, and PI17/00663, PI18/01142 and PI19/1338Provincial Government of Gipuzkoa DFG06/002, DFG08/001 and DFG15/221UE FP7-ENV-2011 cod 282957, HEALTH.2010.2.4.5-1 and ATHLETE cod 874583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socioeconomic position (SEP) may have different effects on cognitive development and family context could play a role in this association. This work aimed to analyse the role of socioeconomic positions, measured via various indicators collected longitudinally, in cognitive development at 7-11 years of age, evaluating the role of family context as a potential mediator. The study sample included 394 and 382 children from the INMA Gipuzkoa and Valencia cohorts, respectively. SEP indicators were assessed during pregnancy (family social class, parental education, employment, and disposable income) and at 7 (Gipuzkoa) and 11 (Valencia) years of age (At Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion (AROPE)). Family context and cognitive development were measured with the Haezi-Etxadi Family Assessment Scale 7-11 (HEFAS 7-11) and Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (Raven's CPM), respectively. Linear regression models were developed to assess the relationships between (a) SEP-family context, (b) SEP-cognitive development, and (c) family context-cognitive development, adjusting for a priori-selected confounders. Simple and multiple mediation analyses were performed to explore the role of family context in the SEP-cognitive development relationship. Lower SEP was related with a lower cognitive score, this association being particularly robust for family social class. SEP indicators were related to subscales of family context, in particular those regarding cognitive stimulation, parental stress, and parenting. A relationship was also found between these three subscales and child cognitive development, mediating the effect of family social class on child cognition by 5.2, 5.5, and 10.8%, respectively, and 12.0% jointly.    Conclusion: Both family SEP and context contribute to a child's cognitive development. Equalising policies and positive parenting programmes could contribute to improving cognitive development in children. What is Known: • Parental social class, education, and employment status have been widely employed to measure socioeconomic position. What is New: • This work focuses on standard measurements of socioeconomic position but also other economic indicators such as the EHII and AROPE, and their effect on child cognitive development and family context. • Promotion of cognitive and linguistic development, parental stress and conflict, and parental profile fostering child development mediated the effect of family social class on cognitive development.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCognitionSocial ClassChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleParentingSocioeconomic FactorsCognitive developmentFamily contextSocioeconomic position

Identifiers

PMID38483609
PMCPMC11098862
OpenAlexW4392804671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.