Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483596›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

WATTS happening? Evaluation of thermal dose during holmium laser lithotripsy in a high-fidelity anatomic model.

Christopher Wanderling, Aaron Saxton, Dennis Phan, Karen Doersch, Lauren Shepard, Nathan Schuler, Thomas Osinski, Scott Quarrier, Ahmed Ghazi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher WanderlingDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. Christopher_Wanderling@urmc.rochester.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3011-9080
Aaron SaxtonDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Dennis PhanDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Karen DoerschDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Lauren ShepardDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Nathan SchulerDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Thomas OsinskiDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Scott QuarrierDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Ahmed GhaziDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the thermal profiles of the holmium laser at different laser parameters at different locations in an in vitro anatomic pelvicalyceal collecting system (PCS) model. Laser lithotripsy is the cornerstone of treatment for urolithiasis. With the prevalence of high-powered lasers, stone ablation efficiency has become more pronounced. Patient safety remains paramount during surgery. It is well recognized that the heat generated from laser lithotripsy has the potential to cause thermal tissue damage.

methodsUtilizing high-fidelity, 3D printed hydrogel models of a PCS with a synthetic BegoStone implanted in the renal pelvis, laser lithotripsy was performed with the Moses 2.0 holmium laser. At a standard power (40 W) and irrigation pressure (100 cm H

resultsTemperatures were highest closest to the laser tip with a decrease away from the laser. Fluid temperatures increased with longer laser-on times and higher ODCs. Thermal doses were greater with increased ODCs and the threshold for thermal injury was reached for ODCs of 75% and 100%.

conclusionTemperature generation and thermal dose delivered are greatest closer to the tip of the laser fiber and are not dependent on power alone. Significant temperature differences were noted between four laser settings at a standardized power (40 W). Temperatures can be influenced by a variety of factors, such as laser-on time, operator duty cycle, and location in the PCS.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLithotripsyLithotripsy, LaserHolmiumHumansModels, AnatomicHolmiumAnatomic modelHolmiumLaser lithotripsyTemperatureThermal dose

Identifiers

PMID38483596
OpenAlexW4392818237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.