Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483564›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Taking time to compose thoughts with prefrontal schemata.

Kwang Il Ryom, Anindita Basu, Debora Stendardi, Elisa Ciaramelli, Alessandro Treves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kwang Il RyomSISSA - Cognitive Neuroscience, via Bonomea 265, 34136, Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4580-4374
Anindita BasuSISSA - Cognitive Neuroscience, via Bonomea 265, 34136, Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-3787
Debora StendardiDip. Psicologia Renzo Canestrari, Univ. Bologna, Viale C. Berti-Pichat 5, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Elisa CiaramelliDip. Psicologia Renzo Canestrari, Univ. Bologna, Viale C. Berti-Pichat 5, 40126, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-8060
Alessandro TrevesSISSA - Cognitive Neuroscience, via Bonomea 265, 34136, Trieste, Italy. ale@sissa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-5673

Funding

Ministero dell'Universitá e della Ricerca PRIN grant 20174TPEFJ "TRIPS" to EC and AT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under what conditions can prefrontal cortex direct the composition of brain states, to generate coherent streams of thoughts? Using a simplified Potts model of cortical dynamics, crudely differentiated into two halves, we show that once activity levels are regulated, so as to disambiguate a single temporal sequence, whether the contents of the sequence are mainly determined by the frontal or by the posterior half, or by neither, depends on statistical parameters that describe its microcircuits. The frontal cortex tends to lead if it has more local attractors, longer lasting and stronger ones, in order of increasing importance. Its guidance is particularly effective to the extent that posterior cortices do not tend to transition from state to state on their own. The result may be related to prefrontal cortex enforcing its temporally-oriented schemata driving coherent sequences of brain states, unlike the atemporal "context" contributed by the hippocampus. Modelling a mild prefrontal (vs. posterior) lesion offers an account of mind-wandering and event construction deficits observed in prefrontal patients.

Indexed as

Prefrontal CortexThinkingHumansModels, NeurologicalTime FactorsAssociative memoryCortical networksLatching dynamicsMind-wanderingSequential retrievalSpontaneous cognition

Identifiers

PMID38483564
PMCPMC11078815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.