Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483562›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2024

Cardiovascular disease risk assessment and multidisciplinary care in prostate cancer treatment with ADT: recommendations from the APMA PCCV expert network.

Axel S Merseburger, Ganesh Bakshi, Dong-Yi Chen, Edmund Chiong, Michel Jabbour, Jae Young Joung, Allen Yu-Hung Lai, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Tuan-Anh Le, Chi Fai Ng and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 17 institutions in 11 countries.

Axel S MerseburgerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany. axel.merseburger@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-3931
Ganesh BakshiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Dong-Yi ChenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Edmund ChiongDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, and Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Michel JabbourDivision of Urology, Saint Georges Hospital, Balamand University, Achrafieh, Beirut, Lebanon.
Jae Young JoungCenter for Urological Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Allen Yu-Hung LaiGlobal Health Program, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Nathan LawrentschukDepartment of Urology and Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Tuan-Anh LeCho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Chi Fai NgSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong.
Choon Ta NgDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Teng Aik OngDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Jacob See-Tong PangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Danny M RabahThe Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Narasimhan RagavanDepartment of Urology, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Kazuhiro SaseClinical Pharmacology and Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Michelle Mui Hian TeoFerring Pharmaceuticals, Singapore, Singapore.
Hiroji UemuraYokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Henry H WooDepartment of Urology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKApollo Hospitals · INAustralian National University · AUChang Gung University · TWCho Ray Hospital · VNJuntendo University · JPKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SALinkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWNational Cancer Center · KRNational Taiwan University · TWNational University of Singapore · SGP. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre · INThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUToho University · JPUniversitäres Kinderwunschzentrum Lübeck · DEUniversity of Malaya · MYYokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay approach for prostate cancer (PCa) management. However, the most commonly used ADT modality, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

methodsThe PCa Cardiovascular (PCCV) Expert Network, consisting of multinational urologists, cardiologists and oncologists with expertise in managing PCa, convened to discuss challenges to routine cardiovascular risk assessment in PCa management, as well as how to mitigate such risks in the current treatment landscape.

resultsThe experts identified several barriers, including lack of awareness, time constraints, challenges in implementing risk assessment tools and difficulties in establishing multidisciplinary teams that include cardiologists. The experts subsequently provided practical recommendations to improve cardio-oncology care for patients with PCa receiving ADT, such as simplifying cardiovascular risk assessment, individualising treatment based on CVD risk categories, establishing multidisciplinary teams and referral networks and fostering active patient engagement. A streamlined cardiovascular risk-stratification tool and a referral/management guide were developed for seamless integration into urologists' practices and presented herein. The PCCV Expert Network agreed that currently available evidence indicates that GnRH antagonists are associated with a lower risk of CVD than that of GnRH agonists and that GnRH antagonists are preferred for patients with PCa and a high CVD risk.

conclusionIn summary, this article provides insights and guidance to improve management for patients with PCa undergoing ADT.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansMaleRisk AssessmentAndrogen AntagonistsGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneAndrogen deprivation therapyCardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular toxicityInterdisciplinaryProstate cancerRisk management

Identifiers

PMID38483562
PMCPMC10940372
OpenAlexW4392818227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.