Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483458›Full record

ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2024

Patients' Perspectives on Plans Generated During Primary Care Visits and Self-Reported Adherence at 3 Months: Data From a Randomized Trial.

Cheryl D Stults, Kathleen M Mazor, Michael Cheung, Bernice Ruo, Martina Li, Amanda Walker, Cassandra Saphirak, Florin Vaida, Sonal Singh, Kimberly A Fisher and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03385512 (Improving Patient-Centered Communication in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03385512 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Patient-Centered Communication in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the Comparative Effectiveness of Three Interventions

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2018 to 2022Enrolled5,565ConditionsPatient Engagement, Physician's Role, Physician-Patient Relations, Patient ActivationArmsOPEN High Touch, OPEN High Tech, ASK Poster in Exam Rooms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. US food allergy patients' experiences, priorities, and needs: A qualitative study.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl D StultsPalo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Center for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-1511
Kathleen M MazorDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9491-9872
Michael CheungHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-7265
Bernice RuoDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-0821
Martina LiPalo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Center for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5031-0543
Amanda WalkerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5777-6684
Cassandra SaphirakDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8676-3345
Florin VaidaHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2256-4611
Sonal SinghDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0912-941X
Kimberly A FisherDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1802-3457
Rebecca RosenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6580-8324
Robert YoodResearch Department, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3467-1411
Lawrence GarberResearch Department, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1500-5421
Christopher LonghurstDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4908-6856
Gene KallenbergDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-2672
Edward YuDepartment of Family Medicine, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Health, Mountain View, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-3500
Albert ChanPalo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Center for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4972-5569
Marlene MillenDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2671-5755
Ming Tai-SealeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-066X
University of California San Diego · USSutter Health · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USReliant Medical Group · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective primary care necessitates follow-up actions by the patient beyond the visit. Prior research suggests room for improvement in patient adherence.

objectiveThis study sought to understand patients' views on their primary care visits, the plans generated therein, and their self-reported adherence after 3 months.

methodsAs part of a large multisite cluster randomized pragmatic trial in 3 health care organizations, patients completed 2 surveys-the first within 7 days after the index primary care visit and another 3 months later. For this analysis of secondary outcomes, we combined the results across all study participants to understand patient adherence to care plans. We recorded patient characteristics and survey responses. Cross-tabulation and chi-square statistics were used to examine bivariate associations, adjusting for multiple comparisons when appropriate. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess how patients' intention to follow, agreement, and understanding of their plans impacted their plan adherence, allowing for differences in individual characteristics. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to characterize the patient's self-reported plans and reasons for adhering (or not) to the plan 3 months later.

resultsOf 2555 patients, most selected the top box option (9=definitely agree) that they felt they had a clear plan (n=2011, 78%), agreed with the plan (n=2049, 80%), and intended to follow the plan (n=2108, 83%) discussed with their provider at the primary care visit. The most common elements of the plans reported included reference to exercise (n=359, 14.1%), testing (laboratory, imaging, etc; n=328, 12.8%), diet (n=296, 11.6%), and initiation or adjustment of medications; (n=284, 11.1%). Patients who strongly agreed that they had a clear plan, agreed with the plan, and intended to follow the plan were all more likely to report plan completion 3 months later (P<.001) than those providing less positive ratings. Patients who reported plans related to following up with the primary care provider (P=.008) to initiate or adjust medications (P≤.001) and to have a specialist visit were more likely to report that they had completely followed the plan (P=.003). Adjusting for demographic variables, patients who indicated intent to follow their plan were more likely to follow-through 3 months later (P<.001). Patients' reasons for completely following the plan were mainly that the plan was clear (n=1114, 69.5%), consistent with what mattered (n=1060, 66.1%), and they were determined to carry through with the plan (n=887, 53.3%). The most common reasons for not following the plan were lack of time (n=217, 22.8%), having decided to try a different approach (n=105, 11%), and the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the plan (n=105, 11%).

conclusionsPatients' initial assessment of their plan as clear, their agreement with the plan, and their initial willingness to follow the plan were all strongly related to their self-reported completion of the plan 3 months later. Patients whose plans involved lifestyle changes were less likely to report that they had "completely" followed their plan.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03385512; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03385512. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/30431.

Indexed as

adherenceattitudeattitudescontent analysiscontrolled trialcontrolled trialsexperienceexperiencesopinionpatient adherenceperceptionperceptionsperspectiveperspectivesplanplansprimary carerandomizedRCTself-reportedsurveysurveyswillingness

Identifiers

PMID38483458
PMCPMC10979329
OpenAlexW4392817712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.