Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483331›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2024

Cognitive assessment to optimize prediction of functional outcome in subacute hip fracture: a short-term prospective study.

Marco DI Monaco, Maria Sgarbanti, Silvia Trombetta, Laura Gullone, Alessandra Bonardo, Patrizia Gindri, Carlotta Castiglioni, Francesca Bardesono, Edoardo Milano, Giuseppe Massazza

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco DI MonacoDivision of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Osteoporosis Research Center, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy - marco.dimonaco@camilliani.net.
Maria SgarbantiDivision of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Osteoporosis Research Center, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Silvia TrombettaNeuropsychology Service, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Laura GulloneNeuropsychology Service, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Alessandra BonardoNeuropsychology Service, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Patrizia GindriNeuropsychology Service, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Carlotta CastiglioniDivision of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Osteoporosis Research Center, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Francesca BardesonoDivision of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Osteoporosis Research Center, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Edoardo MilanoDivision of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Osteoporosis Research Center, Opera San Camillo Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe MassazzaDivision of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive impairment is a long-known negative prognostic factor after hip fracture. Cognition is usually screened by a single easy-to-administer bedside tool, but recent studies have shown that screening tests may be not enough to rule out cognitive impairment with an unfavorable prognostic role. Unfortunately, data on outcome prediction by further cognitive assessments is sparse.

aimWe focused on patients with subacute hip fracture defined cognitively intact or mildly impaired on the screening evaluation performed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). We hypothesized that each of 3 further cognitive tests could independently predict activities of daily living, with optimal prediction of function obtained by performing all three the tests.

designShort-term prospective study.

settingRehabilitation ward. POPULATION: Inpatients with subacute hip-fracture.

methodsThree cognitive tests were performed on admission to rehabilitation in the patients who made ≤4 errors on the SPMSQ: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT, immediate and delayed recall) and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). We assessed activities of daily living by the Barthel index. Successful rehabilitation was defined with a Barthel Index Score ≥85.

resultsEach of the three cognitive tests assessed before rehabilitation significantly predicted the Barthel index scores measured at the end of the rehabilitation course in our sample of 280 inpatients. However, only the MoCA score retained its significant predictive role when the scores from the three tests were included together as independent variables in a multiple regression model, with adjustments for a panel of potential confounders (P=0.007). The adjusted odds ratio to achieve successful rehabilitation for a seven-point change in MoCA score was 1.98 (CI 95% from 1.02 to 3.83; P=0.042).

conclusionsContrary to our hypothesis, MoCA but not RAVLT and FAB retained the prognostic role when the scores from the three tests were evaluated together as potential predictors of functional ability in activities of daily living. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: In the presence of a normal (or mildly altered) score on the SPMSQ in subacute hip fracture, MoCA scores improve prediction of activities of daily living and should be routinely performed.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionHip FracturesActivities of Daily LivingCognitionHumansPrognosisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38483331
PMCPMC11112510
OpenAlexW4392799867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.