ArticleJournal of deaf studies and deaf education2024
Motor adaptation in deaf and hearing native signers.
Article in Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have suggested that deafness could lead to deficits in motor skills and other body-related abilities. However, the literature regarding motor skills in deaf adults is scarce and existing studies often included participants with heterogeneous language backgrounds and deafness etiologies, thus making it difficult to delineate the effects of deafness. In this study, we investigated motor learning in deaf native signers and hearing nonsigners. To isolate the effects of deafness and those of acquiring a signed language, we additionally tested a group of hearing native signers. Two well-established paradigms of motor learning were employed, in which participants had to adapt their hand movements to a rotation of the visual feedback (Experiment 1) or to the introduction of a force field (Experiment 2). Proprioceptive estimates were assessed before and after adaptation. Like hearing nonsigners, deaf and hearing signers showed robust adaptation in both motor adaptation paradigms. No significant differences in motor adaptation and memory were observed between deaf signers and hearing nonsigners, as well as between hearing signers and hearing nonsigners. Moreover, no discernible group differences in proprioceptive accuracy were observed. These findings challenge the prevalent notion that deafness leads to deficits in motor skills and other body-related abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.