Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483083›Full record

SynthesisActa dermato-venereologica2024

Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnosis of Melanoma and Keratinocyte Carcinomas: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pablo Díaz-Calvillo, Daniel Muñoz-Barba, Clara Ureña-Paniego, Lara Valeska Maul, Sara Cerminara, Lisa Kostner, Antonio Martínez López, Salvador Arias-Santiago

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pablo Díaz-CalvilloDepartment of Dermatology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
Daniel Muñoz-BarbaDepartment of Dermatology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
Clara Ureña-PaniegoDepartment of Dermatology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
Lara Valeska MaulDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sara CerminaraDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lisa KostnerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. lisa.kostner@usb.ch.
Antonio Martínez LópezDepartment of Dermatology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain. antoniomartinezlopez@aol.com.
Salvador Arias-SantiagoDepartment of Dermatology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain; Department of Dermatology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ESUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected healthcare. The real effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on skin cancer are still unclear, more than 3 years later. This study aims to summarise the pandemic's impact on skin cancer diagnosis and outcome. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, selecting studies comparing skin cancer diagnosis and prognosis post-pandemic with pre-pandemic data. A total of 27 papers were reviewed including 102,263 melanomas and 271,483 keratinocyte carcinomas. During the initial pandemic months (January-July 2020), melanoma surgeries dropped by 29.7% and keratinocyte carcinomas surgeries by 50.8%. Early pandemic tumours exhibited greater thickness and stage. In a long-term period beyond the initial months, melanoma surgeries decreased by 9.3%, keratinocyte carcinomas by 16.6%. No significant differences were observed in the Breslow thickness of melanomas after the start of the pandemic (mean difference 0.06, 95% confidence interval -0.46, 0.58). Melanomas operated on post-pandemic onset had an increased risk of ulceration (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.22-1.50). Keratinocyte carcinomas showed increased thickness and worsened stage post-pandemic. However, studies included were mostly retrospective and cross-sectional, reporting diverse data. This review indicates that the pandemic likely caused delays in skin cancer diagnosis and treatment, potentially impacting patient outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19KeratinocytesMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID38483083
PMCPMC10953710
OpenAlexW4392817285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.