Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38483077›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2024

Validation of Salamander Dermal Mucus Swabs as a Novel, Nonlethal Approach for Amphibian Metabolomics and Glutathione Analysis Following Pesticide Exposure.

Robin J Van Meter, Donna A Glinski, Jennifer J Wanat, S Thomas Purucker, W Matthew Henderson

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robin J Van MeterBiology and Environmental Science & Studies, Washington College, Chestertown, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-0266
Donna A GlinskiOffice of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7934-5666
Jennifer J WanatBiology and Environmental Science & Studies, Washington College, Chestertown, Maryland, USA.
S Thomas PuruckerOffice of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, North Carolina.
W Matthew HendersonOffice of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2800-8536

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating biomarkers of stress in amphibians is critical to conservation, yet current techniques are often destructive and/or time-consuming, which limits ease of use. In the present study, we validate the use of dermal swabs in spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) for biochemical profiling, as well as glutathione (GSH) stress response following pesticide exposure. Thirty-three purchased spotted salamanders were acclimated to laboratory conditions at Washington College (Chestertown, MD, USA) for 4 weeks. Following acclimation, salamanders were randomly sorted into three groups for an 8-h pesticide exposure on soil: control with no pesticide, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), or chlorpyrifos. Before and after exposure, mucus samples were obtained by gently rubbing a polyester-tipped swab 50 times across the ventral and dorsal surfaces. Salamanders were humanely euthanized and dissected to remove the brain for acetylcholinesterase and liver for GSH and hepatic metabolome analyses, and a whole-body tissue homogenate was used for pesticide quantification. Levels of GSH were present in lower quantities on dermal swabs relative to liver tissues for chlorpyrifos, 2,4-D, and control treatments. However, 2,4-D exposures demonstrated a large effect size increase for GSH levels in livers (Cohen's d = 0.925, p = 0.036). Other GSH increases were statistically insignificant, and effect sizes were characterized as small for 2,4-D mucosal swabs (d = 0.36), medium for chlorpyrifos mucosal swabs (d = 0.713), and negligible for chlorpyrifos liver levels (d = 0.012). The metabolomics analyses indicated that the urea cycle, alanine, and glutamate metabolism biological pathways were perturbed by both sets of pesticide exposures. Obtaining mucus samples through dermal swabbing in amphibians is a viable technique for evaluating health in these imperiled taxa. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:1126-1137. © 2024 SETAC.

Indexed as

GlutathioneMetabolomics2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidAmbystomaAnimalsBiomarkersChlorpyrifosMucusPesticidesSkin2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidBiomarkersChlorpyrifosGlutathionePesticidesAmphibiansBiomarkersMucosal swabPesticidesSalamander

Identifiers

PMID38483077
PMCPMC11420827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.