Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482810›Full record

ArticleJournal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association2024

Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Writing: Current Trends.

Ellen Chetwynd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial: Research ethics and integrity in the artificial intelligence era.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. ChatGPT: how to use it and the pitfalls/cautions in academia.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Artificial Intelligence in Manuscript Preparation: Are We Becoming Dependent on Machines?Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ellen ChetwyndDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5611-8778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast FeedingFemaleHumansartificial intelligencebreastfeedingdigital healthethicshealthcarelactationmachine learningpublication ethics

Identifiers

PMID38482810
PMCPMC11015711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.