Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482698›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

Chromosomal Inversions and the Demography of Speciation in Drosophila montana and Drosophila flavomontana.

Noora Poikela, Dominik R Laetsch, Ville Hoikkala, Konrad Lohse, Maaria Kankare

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Noora PoikelaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4627-9647
Dominik R LaetschInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ville HoikkalaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Konrad LohseInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Maaria KankareDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1541-9050
University of Jyväskylä · FIUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Academy of Finland project 322980ERC starting grant 757648Finnish Cultural FoundationJenny and Antti Wihuri FoundationNatural Environmental Research Council (NERC) NE/L011522/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions may play a central role in speciation given their ability to locally reduce recombination and therefore genetic exchange between diverging populations. We analyzed long- and short-read whole-genome data from sympatric and allopatric populations of 2 Drosophila virilis group species, Drosophila montana and Drosophila flavomontana, to understand if inversions have contributed to their divergence. We identified 3 large alternatively fixed inversions on the X chromosome and one on each of the autosomes 4 and 5. A comparison of demographic models estimated for inverted and noninverted (colinear) chromosomal regions suggests that these inversions arose before the time of the species split. We detected a low rate of interspecific gene flow (introgression) from D. montana to D. flavomontana, which was further reduced inside inversions and was lower in allopatric than in sympatric populations. Together, these results suggest that the inversions were already present in the common ancestral population and that gene exchange between the sister taxa was reduced within inversions both before and after the onset of species divergence. Such ancestrally polymorphic inversions may foster speciation by allowing the accumulation of genetic divergence in loci involved in adaptation and reproductive isolation inside inversions early in the speciation process, while gene exchange at colinear regions continues until the evolving reproductive barriers complete speciation. The overlapping X inversions are particularly good candidates for driving the speciation process of D. montana and D. flavomontana, since they harbor strong genetic incompatibilities that were detected in a recent study of experimental introgression.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionDrosophilaAnimalsDemographyGenetic SpeciationMontanaX Chromosomechromosomal inversioncoalescenceDrosophilagenetic divergenceintrogressionspeciation

Identifiers

PMID38482698
PMCPMC10972691
OpenAlexW4392791154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.