Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482501›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Value-based decision-making between affective and non-affective memories.

Erdem Pulcu, Calum Guinea, Hannah Clemens, Catherine J Harmer, Susannah E Murphy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erdem PulcuUniversity of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
Calum GuineaUniversity of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
Hannah ClemensUniversity of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
Catherine J HarmerUniversity of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
Susannah E MurphyUniversity of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX Oxford, UK.
Warneford Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S035591/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective biases can change how past events are recalled from memory. To capture mechanisms underlying affective memory formation, recall, and bias, we studied value-based decision-making (VBDM) between reward memories encoded in different mood states. Our findings suggest that following discrete affective events, created by large magnitude wins and losses on a Wheel of Fortune (WoF), healthy volunteers display an overall positive memory bias [favoring higher probability shapes learned after a WoF win compared with those learnt after a WoF loss outcome]. During this VBDM process, participants' pupils constrict before decision-onset for higher-value choices, and remained dilated for a sustained period after choice. Sustained pupil dilation was particularly sensitive to the reward values of abstract memories encoded in a positive mood. Taken together, we demonstrate that experimentally induced affective memories are recalled with a positive bias, and pupil-linked central arousal systems are actively engaged during VBDM between affective and non-affective memories.

Indexed as

NeurosciencePsychologySocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID38482501
PMCPMC10933545
OpenAlexW4392139511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.