ArticleiScience2024
Predicting potential target genes in molecular biology experiments using machine learning and multifaceted data sources.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic and immunological implications of sialylation-associated gene signatures in hepatocellular carcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- gSELECT: A novel pre-analysis machine-learning library enabling early hypothesis testing and predictive gene selection in single-cell data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experimental analysis of functionally related genes is key to understanding biological phenomena. The selection of genes to study is a crucial and challenging step, as it requires extensive knowledge of the literature and diverse biomedical data resources. Although software tools that predict relationships between genes are available to accelerate this process, they do not directly incorporate experiment information derived from the literature. Here, we develop LEXAS, a target gene suggestion system for molecular biology experiments. LEXAS is based on machine learning models trained with diverse information sources, including 24 million experiment descriptions extracted from full-text articles in PubMed Central by using a deep-learning-based natural language processing model. By integrating the extracted experiment contexts with biomedical data sources, LEXAS suggests potential target genes for upcoming experiments, complementing existing tools like STRING, FunCoup, and GOSemSim. A simple web interface enables biologists to consider newly derived gene information while planning experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.