ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
A postoperative tumor-specific death prediction model for patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is fluorometric sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer necessary?Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is an epithelial malignancy occurring in the endometrium, with a 5-year mortality rate of above 10%. However, there is currently a lack of studies exploring the potential of a predictive model of tumor-specific death after surgery in these patients. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2017, data related to 482 patients with EC admitted to the Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University were analyzed. Patients were divided into death (n=62) and survival (n=420) groups according to whether tumor-specific death occurred at 5 years postoperatively or not. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were compared, and the risk factors for tumor-specific death in patients with EC 5 years after surgery were investigated by logistics regression analysis. A nomogram prediction model was established according to the relevant risk factors. Results: Tumor size, Ki-67 positive rate, Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and the rate of vascular tumor thrombus between the two groups (P<0.05) were found to be the statistically significant factors. Positive Ki-67, tumor size >3.35 cm, stage III, and vascular tumor thrombus were factors that influenced the tumor-specific death at 5 years after surgery (P<0.05). The predictive model obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in the training and verification sets of 0.847 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.779-0.916] and 0.886 (95% CI: 0.803-0.969), respectively. Conclusions: The nomogram prediction model, which was established in this study, was proved to be valuable in predicting tumor-specific death 5 years after the surgery in patients with EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.