Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482417›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2024

The value of a panel of circulating microRNAs in screening prostate cancer.

Chen Sun, Chong Lu, Xinji Li, Rongkang Li, Zhenyu Wen, Zhenjian Ge, Wenkang Chen, Yingqi Li, Suolei Sun, Qingshan Yang and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chen Sun *Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Chong Lu *Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Xinji LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Rongkang LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhenyu WenDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhenjian GeDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Wenkang ChenDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Yingqi LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Suolei SunDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Qingshan YangDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Lingzhi TaoDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Hang LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Yongqing LaiDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Institute of Urology, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, the fifth Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital · CNPeking University Shenzhen Hospital · CNAnhui Medical University · CNShantou University Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a worldwide public health problem that poses a serious threat to the health of men worldwide. Many studies have found that microRNA (miRNA) in serum has the potential to be a biomarker for cancer screening. Our study was conducted to investigate the value of serum miRNAs in PCa screening. Methods: We selected 12 miRNAs from past studies for its association with PCa. We checked the expression levels of these miRNAs in the serum of 112 PCa patients and 112 healthy controls in a two-stage experiment. We plotted the receiver operating characteristic curve of miRNAs in the validation stage and constructed a four-miRNA panel with the highest diagnostic value using stepwise logistic regression. We also predicted the target genes with these four miRNAs through online databases and performed Gene Ontology functional annotation and pathway analysis. Results: The results showed that six miRNAs (miR-429, miR-10a-5p, miR-183-5p, miR-181a-5p, miR-1231, miR-129-5p) were abnormally expressed in the serum of PCa patients. We used four of these miRNAs including miR-1231, miR-10a-5p, miR-429 and miR-129-5p to construct a combination of miRNAs with high specificity and sensitivity in screening PCa (area under the curve =0.878). Bioinformatics analysis showed that the genes targeted by these miRNAs can be linked to the development of PCa. Conclusions: Our study detected and identified a set of miRNAs that serves as screening marker for PCa, which may assist in early diagnosis and treatment of PCa.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsmicroRNAprostate cancer (PCa)screening biomarker

Identifiers

PMID38482417
PMCPMC10928619
OpenAlexW4392300972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.