Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482372›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2024

Laboratory Automated Interrogation of Data: an interactive web application for visualization of multilevel data from biological experiments.

Owen R Dando, Zrinko Kozic, Sam A Booker, Giles E Hardingham, Peter C Kind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Owen R DandoSimons Initiative for the Developing Brain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6269-6408
Zrinko KozicSimons Initiative for the Developing Brain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Sam A BookerSimons Initiative for the Developing Brain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Giles E HardinghamSimons Initiative for the Developing Brain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Peter C KindSimons Initiative for the Developing Brain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key step in understanding the results of biological experiments is visualization of the data. Many laboratory experiments contain a range of measurements that exist within a hierarchy of interdependence. An automated and facile way to visualize and interrogate such multilevel data, across many experimental variables, would (i) lead to improved understanding of the results, (ii) help to avoid misleading interpretation of statistics and (iii) easily identify outliers and sources of batch and confounding effects. While many excellent graphing solutions already exist, they are often geared towards the production of publication-ready plots and the analysis of a single variable at a time, require programming expertise or are unnecessarily complex for the task at hand. Here, we present Laboratory Automated Interrogation of Data (LAB-AID), an interactive tool specifically designed to automatically visualize and query hierarchical data resulting from biological experiments.

Indexed as

automatizationdataR Shinystatisticsvisualization

Identifiers

PMID38482372
PMCPMC10935641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.