ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
A comparative study of NS1 and IgM using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunochromatography test for detection of dengue.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dengue is the most common arboviral infection that spreads by Method: In a Tertiary Care Hospital (TCH), sociodemographic status of probable dengue cases from February 2021 to February 2022 was studied. The results of the Dengue Antigen NS1 and IgM ICT, Dengue NS1 Microlisa, and Dengue IgM Microlisa were compared in order to determine the effective one at managing patients and preventing complications like DHF and DSS. Results: In distribution of 100 ICT reactive samples, 50% were NS1 reactive and 50% were IgM reactive. One hundred ICT reactive samples were further processed for IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) for both NS1 and IgM. Sensitivity and specificity of NS1 ICT were 89.3% and 71.4% and that of IgM ICT was 88% and 64.5%. As a result of antigenic cross-reactivity, false positive cases were reported. Platelet count of the patients was correlated with an optical density (OD) value of ELISA for both NS1 and IgM. In the present study, patients having low platelet count showed high OD value. Conclusion: In cases of severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50000), early diagnosis by screening ICT and confirmation by ELISA (NS1 and IgM) would reduce the complications like DHF and DSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.