Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482290›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

A nudge strategy to increase the uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Saudi Arabia: A pragmatic randomized trial in the Hail region.

Fakhralddin A M Elfakki, Khalil I Alshammari, Meshari Y Aljamani, Waleed I Alshammari

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05785975 (Effectiveness of Modified Integrated Colorectal Cancer Screening System), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05785975 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness of Modified Integrated Colorectal Cancer Screening System: A Randomized Clustered Trial in Hail, Saudi Arabia.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe New Model of Care, Hail Health ClusterRan2023 to 2023Enrolled2,520ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colorectal NeoplasmsArmsCertain ommunications(Nudge), community-outreach(landline call), and single FIT testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fakhralddin A M ElfakkiDepartment of Model of Care, Hail Health Cluster, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Khalil I AlshammariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Meshari Y AljamaniDepartment of Model of Care, Hail Health Cluster, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Waleed I AlshammariDepartment of Primary Care, Primary Health Care Physician, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
University of Ha'il · SAImam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to examine the effectiveness of using a nudge strategy to encourage eligible clients to participate in colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) at primary care facilities. Additionally, it emphasizes the good outcomes of utilizing nudge in primary healthcare settings by reflecting on the novel experience of family physicians and nurses in the field of CRCS. Nudge is a cost-effective intervention that serves as a choice architect to assist people in making wise decisions for their lives. It is a subtly changed environment or combination of words that push individuals to make a decision without restricting their alternatives. Research Methods: This is a six-month, pragmatic trial with open-label recruitment that enrolled people with an average CRC risk from four screening healthcare zones that included 34 public primary care facilities. The study protocol is registered and can be accessed here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05785975. Results: An obvious increase in the proportion of the uptake of CRCS screening is higher in the two intervention sites-Al Hait General Hospital Zone (38%) and Al-Shamli General Hospital Zone (26%), than in the two control sites, Bagaa General Hospital Zone (18%) and King Khalid Hospital Zone (18%). Conclusions: Using the nudge strategy to increase CRCS uptake is valuable and effective; additionally, front-line family physicians and nurses in primary care are encouraged to use a planned, positive, and highly selective set of words when offering screening. Policymakers could make use of these research outcomes when designing new guidelines for CRCS.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancer screeningnudgespragmatic trialsprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID38482290
PMCPMC10931851
OpenAlexW4391660570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.