ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
Perception of women on safety and efficacy of contraceptives: A comparative study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Contraceptive information and services are fundamental to the health and human rights of all individuals. Low contraceptive use is a major challenge faced in India. To determine whether a lack of awareness of contraceptive methods was a factor, we assessed the perception of women on contraceptive methods, their safety and efficacy and further determined whether their demographic background played any role in their perception. Materials and Methods: Reproductive-aged women from both rural and urban backgrounds of Bangalore and Tumkur, Karnataka, were individually questioned in a community setting using both Google Forms and personal interviews from September 2022 to December 2022. The questions consisted of limited demographic information and specific questions related to the knowledge and beliefs of women on the efficacy and safety of contraceptive methods and assessed situational awareness. Results: Although awareness was more amongst urban women (99.1%) compared with rural women (79%), the practice was significantly higher amongst rural women (63.2%) compared with urban women (36.7%). Perception showed variations with respect to age, education, religion and parity. A major religion-wise disparity was observed. With regard to safety, oral contraceptive pills (60.9%) and condoms (51.8%) were unanimously perceived to be the most and least harmful to health. The most commonly perceived short-term complications were found to be body changes, and mood swings, tiredness and infertility with no data to support the claim were the most commonly chosen long-term complication. Conclusion: From the study, we concluded that more educated women were not immune to misinformation. The efficacy rates of different methods were highly underestimated with methods with higher failure rates perceived to be more effective. Results demonstrate that women are ill-informed about the long-term complications of various methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.