Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482281›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Perception of women on safety and efficacy of contraceptives: A comparative study.

Anagha Bhat, Muskan Jain, G N Manjunath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anagha BhatDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College and Research Centre, Tumkur, Karnataka, India.
Muskan JainDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College and Research Centre, Tumkur, Karnataka, India.
G N ManjunathDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College and Research Centre, Tumkur, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Contraceptive information and services are fundamental to the health and human rights of all individuals. Low contraceptive use is a major challenge faced in India. To determine whether a lack of awareness of contraceptive methods was a factor, we assessed the perception of women on contraceptive methods, their safety and efficacy and further determined whether their demographic background played any role in their perception. Materials and Methods: Reproductive-aged women from both rural and urban backgrounds of Bangalore and Tumkur, Karnataka, were individually questioned in a community setting using both Google Forms and personal interviews from September 2022 to December 2022. The questions consisted of limited demographic information and specific questions related to the knowledge and beliefs of women on the efficacy and safety of contraceptive methods and assessed situational awareness. Results: Although awareness was more amongst urban women (99.1%) compared with rural women (79%), the practice was significantly higher amongst rural women (63.2%) compared with urban women (36.7%). Perception showed variations with respect to age, education, religion and parity. A major religion-wise disparity was observed. With regard to safety, oral contraceptive pills (60.9%) and condoms (51.8%) were unanimously perceived to be the most and least harmful to health. The most commonly perceived short-term complications were found to be body changes, and mood swings, tiredness and infertility with no data to support the claim were the most commonly chosen long-term complication. Conclusion: From the study, we concluded that more educated women were not immune to misinformation. The efficacy rates of different methods were highly underestimated with methods with higher failure rates perceived to be more effective. Results demonstrate that women are ill-informed about the long-term complications of various methods.

Indexed as

Contraceptioncontraceptive efficacycontraceptive safetyreproductive healthwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID38482281
PMCPMC10931891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.