ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
An unexpected case of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the colon: a case report.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are the long-term oncologic outcomes different between appendiceal cancer and right-sided colon cancer? An exact matching analysis of a 10-year institutional cohort.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients presenting with large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) comprise a small minority of total colon and rectal cancers (1-2%) with poor prognostic outcomes in lieu of late diagnosis and metastasis at the point of diagnosis. Case Description: We report a case presentation of a 69-year-old male presenting with diffuse, non-severe upper abdominal pain and a positive at-home colon cancer screening test. At the time of presentation, the patient was negative for constipation or blood in stool. The patient underwent a colonoscopy with biopsy results positive for LCNEC within the proximal ascending colon. A right hemicolectomy was performed with subsequent pathology indicating a poorly differentiated LCNEC with 4/18 positive nodes and final pathology showing stage IIIA (T3, N1, M0) with Ki-67 index at 70%. Post-operative intervention included two cycles of carboplatin and etoposide as well as routine follow-up for labs, imaging, and pharmacological management. Conclusions: LCNECs are highly aggressive with poor prognostic outcomes and high mortality rates on both 1- and 5-year survival scales. Prior studies and reports indicated a need for further research and data investigating treatment standardization for patients diagnosed with LCNECs. In lieu of this, this study provides a potential standardized treatment modality combining both European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) and North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) consensus guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.