ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Development and validation of a predictive scoring system for post-transarterial chemoembolization pain management in liver cancer patients.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction Models for Acute and Chronic Postoperative Pain in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis of 81 studies and 9495 patients.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Comparison of various liver cancer staging systems in predicting prognosis after initial transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: a retrospective study from China.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients experiencing severe postoperative pain often show lower adherence to prescribed treatments, highlighting the clinical need for effective pain prediction and management strategies. This study aims to address this gap by identifying key risk factors associated with post-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) pain and developing a predictive scoring system. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from liver cancer patients who underwent their first TACE procedure at our institution between January 2019 and December 2020. Pain levels were assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11). Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation cohorts. In the training cohort, logistic regression was used to evaluate the correlation between various parameters and post-TACE pain, leading to the development of a risk prediction model. This model's performance was subsequently assessed in the validation cohort. Results: The study included 255 patients. Univariate analysis in the training cohort identified tumor number, size, microsphere volume, and operation time as factors associated with postoperative pain. These factors were included in a multivariate model, which demonstrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) of 0.71 in the training cohort and 0.74 in the validation cohort for predicting moderate to severe pain. A nomogram was also developed for clinical application, categorizing patients with scores above 72.90 as high risk for moderate to severe pain. Conclusions: Our research successfully developed and validated a novel scoring system capable of predicting moderate to severe pain following initial TACE treatment. However, the study's predictive accuracy, as reflected by AUC values, suggests that further refinement and validation in larger, diverse cohorts are necessary to enhance its clinical utility. This work underscores the importance of predictive tools in improving postoperative pain management and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.