ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Prognostic evaluation of a multi-target magnetic bead-enriched circulating tumor cell-enriched identification system for colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in the world. Traditional tissue biopsy cannot provide dynamic monitoring of patients' tumors or reflect the characteristics of tumors in real time because the sampling process is invasive and accompanied by risks. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are considered a major cause of tumor metastasis, and investigating CTCs helps to understand the biology and vulnerability of malignant tumors during hematogenous metastasis. Methods: We sequentially used epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-coated immunoliposomal magnetic beads (Ep-IMBs) and vimentin-coated immunoliposomal magnetic beads (Vi-IMBs) to capture and characterize CTCs from 110 CRC patients. We further constructed a Cox risk regression model, optimized the model composition using backward stepwise regression, and finally applied nomograms to show the effect of each variable on survival risk. Results: The specificity of the CTCs enrichment and identification system was 100% and the sensitivity was 79.0%. Multivariate analysis indicated total CTC number was an important predictor for bad survival, whereas American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, lymph node metastasis, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level were associated with prognosis, and the risk of mortality was associated with the AJCC stage of the CRC. Conclusions: The CTC enrichment and identification system constructed in this research demonstrated superior accuracy. In addition, CTCs can be used as an important predictor for prognosis of patients with CRC, and the combination of other clinical predictive factors can help clinicians to better design individualized treatment regimens, which is of great clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.