ArticleACS energy letters2024
Fluorination Effect on Lithium- and Manganese-Rich Layered Oxide Cathodes.
Article in ACS energy letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- F-doped KMnRSC advances · 2026Article
- High-energy anode-free Li metal batteries with in-built surface-fluorinated Li-rich Mn-based cathodes.Science advances · 2026Article
- Origin of Electrochemical Activation Leading to Enhanced Cycling Stability of Li- and Mn-Rich Cathodes.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lithium- and manganese-rich (LMR) layered oxides are promising high-energy cathodes for next-generation lithium-ion batteries, yet their commercialization has been hindered by a number of performance issues. While fluorination has been explored as a mitigating approach, results from polycrystalline-particle-based studies are inconsistent and the mechanism for improvement in some reports remains unclear. In the present study, we develop an
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.