Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482154›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2024

Trials Methodology Research: what is it and why should India invest in it?

Sangeetha Paramasivan, Anant Bhan, Rashmi Rodrigues, Usha Menon

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sangeetha ParamasivanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Anant BhanBhopal Hub, Sangath, India.
Rashmi RodriguesCommunity Health, St. John's Medical College, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Usha MenonMRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, United Kingdom.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBSt. John's National Academy of Health Sciences · INUniversity of Bristol · GBYenepoya University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Viewpoint presents an overview of trials methodology research (TMR) and the case for investing in TMR in India. Randomised controlled trials and other types of clinical research inform evidence-based medicine, but this endeavour is dependent on the quality of such research. TMR is aimed at improving the way in which clinical trials are designed, conducted, analysed, and reported. The evolution of TMR in countries like the UK has been nurtured through dedicated funding support. Similar funding opportunities for TMR in India will help optimise the ethical and methodological rigour of the growing number of trials conducted in India. Such funding could help initiate an interdisciplinary network of key stakeholders in India to lead on TMR priority-setting exercises so that methodological questions of relevance to India are addressed. The establishment of trials methodology hubs will enhance initiatives such as the disease-specific clinical trials networks being set up as part of the National Biopharma Mission in India. We posit that promoting and establishing TMR as a distinct field of study in India will ensure the improvement of our health research ecosystem and call on national and international funding bodies to initiate consultation, consensus building and ringfenced funding for TMR in India.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsIndiaRandomised controlled trialsTrials methodology research

Identifiers

PMID38482154
PMCPMC10934319
OpenAlexW4391466997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.