ArticleJDS communications2024
Ruminal pH sensing for monitoring volatile fatty acid concentrations in response to short-term dietary disruption.
Article in JDS communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-related shifts of dissolved hydrogen and its impact on rumen fermentation dynamics and microbial communities in goats (Capra hircus).BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- In Vivo and In Vitro Digestibility and Fermentation Characteristics of Spent Mushroom Substrate (Pleurotus ostreatus) as a Feed Resource for Small Ruminants.Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan GakkaihoArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of using ruminal pH measurements to track time-series ruminal volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations occurring in response to short-term dietary disruption. Four ruminally cannulated dry Holstein dairy cows were individually housed and assigned to 4 treatments in a Latin square design. Treatments differing in forage-to-concentrate (F:C) ratio (100:0 to 55:45) were used because they were expected to result in large differences in VFA concentration, over which the relationships between pH and VFA could be robustly evaluated. Each sampling period lasted 36 h. Animals were removed from pasture and fasted for 24 h, after which time they were fed their treatment ration for 2 h and sampled for rumen fluid hourly for 12 h. Rumen fluid samples were analyzed immediately for pH, frozen, and subsequently analyzed for VFA concentrations using gas chromatography. Animals were returned to pasture for 7 d between sampling periods. To confirm that the short-term dietary disruptions resulted in expected variation in VFA concentrations, mean VFA concentrations during each animal period (n = 16) were analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with fixed (linear and quadratic) effects for F:C ratio and random effects for animal and period. Results indicated significant changes in VFA concentration across F:C ratio, but no significant shifts in VFA molar proportions, perhaps due to the short-term nature of the feeding protocol. To explore opportunity to use pH measurements to explain variability in VFA concentrations in real time across dietary conditions, a linear mixed-effect model was used to link the time-series measurements (n = 207). The VFA concentrations were analyzed with linear mixed effect models using linear and quadratic terms for pH, and random effects for animal and period. These models had poor accuracy, with residual error variance ranging from 21% to 38%, and residuals patterning significantly with F:C ratio. The data suggest that pH may lack reliability for VFA prediction in short-term feeding scenarios differing considerably in F:C ratio.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.