ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2024
Shoulder Pain in Persons With Tetraplegia and the Association With Force Application During Manual Wheelchair Propulsion.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Usability Tests for Manual Wheelchairs: Enhancing Mobility and Reducing Shoulder Injuries in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injuries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between propulsion biomechanics, including force application and spatio-temporal characteristics, and shoulder pain in persons with tetraplegia. Design: Cross-sectional, observational study. Setting: Non-university research institution. Participants: 16 community dwelling, wheelchair dependent persons with a chronic tetraplegia between C4 and C7, with and without shoulder pain (age, 49.1±11.7 years; 94% men, 23.4±9.5 years past injury). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Force application and spatio-temporal characteristics of wheelchair propulsion on a treadmill (0.56 m/s, 10W and 0.83 m/s, 15W). Participants were stratified in groups with low, moderate, and high pain based on their Wheelchair User Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI) score on the day of measurement. Results: The mixed-effect multilevel analysis showed that wheelchair users with high levels of shoulder pain applied propulsion force more effectively (and with a lower medial component) and over a longer push angle, thus shortening the recovery time as compared with persons with low or moderate levels of shoulder pain. Conclusions: In contrast with previous results from persons with a paraplegia, persons with tetraplegia and high levels of shoulder pain propel their wheelchair more optimal with regard to risk factors for shoulder pain. Our results therefore affirm that there is a different interaction of shoulder pain and propulsion biomechanics in persons with a tetraplegia which should be considered when further analyzing risk factors for shoulder pain in wheelchair users or applying literature results to different patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.