Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482062›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2024

Bio-based unsaturated polyester resin from post-consumer PET.

David Rubeš, Jaromír Vinklárek, Štěpán Podzimek, Jan Honzíček

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David RubešInstitute of Chemistry and Technology of Macromolecular Materials, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice Studentská 573 532 10 Pardubice Czech Republic jan.honzicek@upce.cz.
Jaromír VinklárekDepartment of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice Studentská 573 532 10 Pardubice Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-1951
Štěpán PodzimekInstitute of Chemistry and Technology of Macromolecular Materials, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice Studentská 573 532 10 Pardubice Czech Republic jan.honzicek@upce.cz.
Jan HonzíčekInstitute of Chemistry and Technology of Macromolecular Materials, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice Studentská 573 532 10 Pardubice Czech Republic jan.honzicek@upce.cz.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-614X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the utilization of post-consumer poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) as a material in the synthesis of styrene-free unsaturated polyester (UP) resin. The process involves glycolysis of PET waste with diethylene glycol and condensation polymerization with bio-based itaconic acid. The resulting unsaturated polyester possesses reactive methylidene functions that, in contrast to commonly employed fumarates/maleates, facilitate copolymerization with non-styrene reactive diluents. To formulate the resins, methacrylates and itaconates were used for dilution, and the curing process is achieved through a redox initiation system at room temperature, followed by post-curing at elevated temperatures. The cured formulations were characterized by their glass transition temperature, determined by DMA analysis. Mechanical properties were evaluated using standardized tests in tension, flexure, and compression. Particularly promising characteristics are observed in formulations incorporating bio-based dimethyl itaconate (DMI), allowing the formulation of materials with a high ultimate flexural strength (

Identifiers

PMID38482062
PMCPMC10934379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.