Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482053›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2024

iPSC-cardiomyocytes in the preclinical prediction of candidate pharmaceutical toxicity.

Tim Y T Lee, John G Coles, Jason T Maynes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Advanced cardiotoxicity profiling using field potential imaging with UHD-CMOS-MEA in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Environmental Cues Facilitate Maturation and Patterning of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes.Cellular physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tim Y T LeeProgram in Molecular Medicine, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John G ColesProgram in Translational Medicine, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jason T MaynesProgram in Molecular Medicine, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many challenges remain in the preclinical evaluation, adjudication, and prioritization of novel compounds in therapeutic discovery pipelines. These obstacles are evident by the large number of candidate or lead compounds failing to reach clinical trials, significantly due to a lack of efficacy in the disease paradigm of interest and/or the presence of innate chemical toxicity. The consequential compound attrition in discovery pipelines results in added monetary and time costs, potential danger to patients, and a slowed discovery of true therapeutics. The low rate of successful translation calls for improved models that can recapitulate

Indexed as

cardiaccardiotoxicitydrug discoveryipsc-cmpharmaceuticalpreclinical

Identifiers

PMID38482053
PMCPMC10933010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.