Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38482016›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Decoding the tumor microenvironment and molecular mechanism: unraveling cervical cancer subpopulations and prognostic signatures through scRNA-Seq and bulk RNA-seq analyses.

Zhiheng Lin, Xinhan Li, Hengmei Shi, Renshuang Cao, Lijun Zhu, Chunxiao Dang, Yawen Sheng, Weisen Fan, Zhenghui Yang, Siyu Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis reveals a lack of CXCL13Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiheng Lin *Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xinhan Li *Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Hengmei Shi *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Renshuang CaoWangjing Hospital of Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lijun ZhuLonghua Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chunxiao DangShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yawen ShengShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Weisen FanShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zhenghui Yang *Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
Siyu Wu *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNNanjing Medical University · CNShandong University · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · CNZunyi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical carcinoma (CC) represents a prevalent gynecological neoplasm, with a discernible rise in prevalence among younger cohorts observed in recent years. Nonetheless, the intrinsic cellular heterogeneity of CC remains inadequately investigated. Methods: We utilized single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) transcriptomic analysis to scrutinize the tumor epithelial cells derived from four specimens of cervical carcinoma (CC) patients. This method enabled the identification of pivotal subpopulations of tumor epithelial cells and elucidation of their contributions to CC progression. Subsequently, we assessed the influence of associated molecules in bulk RNA sequencing (Bulk RNA-seq) cohorts and performed cellular experiments for validation purposes. Results: Through our analysis, we have discerned C3 PLP2+ Tumor Epithelial Progenitor Cells as a noteworthy subpopulation in cervical carcinoma (CC), exerting a pivotal influence on the differentiation and progression of CC. We have established an independent prognostic indicator-the PLP2+ Tumor EPCs score. By stratifying patients into high and low score groups based on the median score, we have observed that the high-score group exhibits diminished survival rates compared to the low-score group. The correlations observed between these groups and immune infiltration, enriched pathways, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), drug sensitivity, among other factors, further underscore their impact on CC prognosis. Cellular experiments have validated the significant impact of ATF6 on the proliferation and migration of CC cell lines. Conclusion: This study enriches our comprehension of the determinants shaping the progression of CC, elevates cognizance of the tumor microenvironment in CC, and offers valuable insights for prospective CC therapies. These discoveries contribute to the refinement of CC diagnostics and the formulation of optimal therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

CarcinomaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesRNA-SeqSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisTumor Microenvironmentbulk RNA-seqcervical cancerexperiment validationPLP2+ Tumor EPCsScRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID38482016
PMCPMC10933018
OpenAlexW4392236376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.