ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Investigating the ability of deep learning-based structure prediction to extrapolate and/or enrich the set of antibody CDR canonical forms.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural T-Cell Receptor Analysis in the Age of Machine Learning.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- T-cell receptor structures and predictive models reveal comparable alpha and beta chain structural diversity despite differing genetic complexity.Communications biology · 2025Article
- ABodyBuilder3: improved and scalable antibody structure predictions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Quantifying conformational changes in the TCR:pMHC-I binding interface.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning models have been shown to accurately predict protein structure from sequence, allowing researchers to explore protein space from the structural viewpoint. In this paper we explore whether "novel" features, such as distinct loop conformations can arise from these predictions despite not being present in the training data. Here we have used ABodyBuilder2, a deep learning antibody structure predictor, to predict the structures of ~1.5M paired antibody sequences. We examined the predicted structures of the canonical CDR loops and found that most of these predictions fall into the already described CDR canonical form structural space. We also found a small number of "new" canonical clusters composed of heterogeneous sequences united by a common sequence motif and loop conformation. Analysis of these novel clusters showed their origins to be either shapes seen in the training data at very low frequency or shapes seen at high frequency but at a shorter sequence length. To evaluate explicitly the ability of ABodyBuilder2 to extrapolate, we retrained several models whilst withholding all antibody structures of a specific CDR loop length or canonical form. These "starved" models showed evidence of generalisation across CDRs of different lengths, but they did not extrapolate to loop conformations which were highly distinct from those present in the training data. However, the models were able to accurately predict a canonical form even if only a very small number of examples of that shape were in the training data. Our results suggest that deep learning protein structure prediction methods are unable to make completely out-of-domain predictions for CDR loops. However, in our analysis we also found that even minimal amounts of data of a structural shape allow the method to recover its original predictive abilities. We have made the ~1.5 M predicted structures used in this study available to download at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10280181.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.