Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481982›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Caller identification and characterization of individual humpback whale acoustic behaviour.

Julia M Zeh, Valeria Perez-Marrufo, Dana L Adcock, Frants H Jensen, Kaitlyn J Knapp, Jooke Robbins, Jennifer E Tackaberry, Mason Weinrich, Ari S Friedlaender, David N Wiley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia M ZehDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University,107 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-100X
Valeria Perez-MarrufoDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University,107 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-3502
Dana L AdcockDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University,107 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-8222
Frants H JensenDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University,107 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8776-3606
Kaitlyn J KnappDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University,107 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Jooke RobbinsCenter for Coastal Studies, Provincetown, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6382-722X
Jennifer E TackaberryCenter for Coastal Studies, Provincetown, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-0912
Mason WeinrichCenter for Coastal Studies, Provincetown, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3037-8863
Ari S FriedlaenderOcean Sciences & Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2822-233X
David N WileyStellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary, Scituate, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-8645
Susan E ParksDepartment of Biology, Syracuse University,107 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6663-627X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic recording tags provide fine-scale data linking acoustic signalling with individual behaviour; however, when an animal is in a group, it is challenging to tease apart calls of conspecifics and identify which individuals produce each call. This, in turn, prohibits a robust assessment of individual acoustic behaviour including call rates and silent periods, call bout production within and between individuals, and caller location. To overcome this challenge, we simultaneously instrumented small groups of humpback whales on a western North Atlantic feeding ground with sound and movement recording tags. This approach enabled a comparison of the relative amplitude of each call across individuals to infer caller identity for 97% of calls. We recorded variable call rates across individuals (mean = 23 calls/h) and groups (mean = 55 calls/h). Calls were produced throughout dives, and most calls were produced in bouts with short inter-call intervals of 2.2 s. Most calls received a likely response from a conspecific within 100 s. This caller identification (ID) method facilitates studying both individual- and group-level acoustic behaviour, yielding novel results about the nature of sequence production and vocal exchanges in humpback whale social calls. Future studies can expand on these caller ID methods for understanding intra-group communication across taxa.

Indexed as

biologgingboutscaller IDcall ratetagsvocal exchange

Identifiers

PMID38481982
PMCPMC10933536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.