Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481955›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Deep learning techniques for imaging diagnosis and treatment of aortic aneurysm.

Legang Huang, Jiankuan Lu, Ying Xiao, Xiaofei Zhang, Cong Li, Guangchao Yang, Xiangfei Jiao, Zijie Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Artificial intelligence in the clinical management and prognostication of mitral regurgitation: a systematic review.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Legang HuangDepartment of Vascular Intervention, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Jiankuan LuDepartment of Vascular Intervention, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Ying XiaoDepartment of Vascular Intervention, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Xiaofei ZhangDepartment of Vascular Intervention, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Cong LiDepartment of Vascular Intervention, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Guangchao YangDepartment of Vascular Intervention, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Xiangfei JiaoDepartment of Vascular Intervention, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Zijie WangDepartment of Vascular Intervention, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to review the application of deep learning techniques in the imaging diagnosis and treatment of aortic aneurysm (AA), focusing on screening, diagnosis, lesion segmentation, surgical assistance, and prognosis prediction. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted, analyzing studies that utilized deep learning models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in various aspects of AA management. The review covered applications in screening, segmentation, surgical planning, and prognosis prediction, with a focus on how these models improve diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Results: Deep learning models demonstrated significant advancements in AA management. For screening and diagnosis, models like ResNet achieved high accuracy in identifying AA in non-contrast CT scans. In segmentation, techniques like U-Net provided precise measurements of aneurysm size and volume, crucial for surgical planning. Deep learning also assisted in surgical procedures by accurately predicting stent placement and postoperative complications. Furthermore, models were able to predict AA progression and patient prognosis with high accuracy. Conclusion: Deep learning technologies show remarkable potential in enhancing the diagnosis, treatment, and management of AA. These advancements could lead to more accurate and personalized patient care, improving outcomes in AA management.

Indexed as

aortic aneurysmartificial intelligencedeep learningimaging diagnosisprediction model

Identifiers

PMID38481955
PMCPMC10933089
OpenAlexW4392235316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.