ArticleCureus2024
Utilization of Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Melanoma: A Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of Non-Invasive Imaging Technologies for Cutaneous Melanoma.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Dysphagia in an 80-Year-Old Woman: A Rare Case of Metastatic Melanoma Presenting in the Small Bowel.Cureus · 2024Article
- Preoperative bimodal imaging evaluation in finding histological correlations ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Advances in the noninvasive diagnosis of melanoma-40 years beyond the ABCDs.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanomas arise de novo or in the context of a precursor lesion. Lesions typically grow radially and then undergo a vertical growth phase proceeding to local invasion and metastasis. This review describes the utility of different imaging modalities in diagnosis and melanocytic lesion monitoring. A literature search was performed in November 2023 utilizing EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed. The PRISMA diagram demonstrates the review process. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) utilizes near-infrared light to help diagnose dermatologic lesions. RCM was found to demonstrate nearly two times the positive predictive value compared to dermoscopy. The introduction of the Berlin Ultrasound (US) Morphology Criteria permitted a 65-80% improvement in diagnostic sensitivity. US with fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) accurately predicts the necessity for sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphadenectomy, sparing patients with metastasis and prompting biopsy for equivocal lesions. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is an adjunctive tool to anatomically and functionally assess lymphatic invasion. SPECT/CT improves the detection of sentinel nodes while decreasing operating time and improving cosmetic outcomes. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with small voxel reconstruction demonstrated increased specificity and sensitivity for detecting in-transit metastases of melanomas, specifically in the limbs. Dermoscopy allows providers to cost-effectively recognize common lesion patterns. Multiphoton microscopy assigns a weight-based score based on malignant features. Optical coherence angiography captures images of vessels to help diagnose equivocal lesions. Utilization of imaging techniques may increase diagnostic accuracy, reduce unnecessary procedures, and help guide treatment plans. Additional research is needed to further characterize the utility of these techniques in order to improve the diagnosis and treatment of melanomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.