ReviewCureus2024
Navigating the Complexity of Scoring Systems in Sepsis Management: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated immune and endothelial profiling predicts 90-day mortality in postoperative sepsis and septic shock.EBioMedicine · 2026Observational
- Validation of SOFA-2 score in sepsis and exploration of its extension with additional immune markers.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- A Simple Admission-Based Score for Early Mortality Risk Stratification in Non-Shock Sepsis: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Construction of a nomogram prediction model for prolonged ICU length of stay in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Sepsis in multimorbidity: a domain-based framework for systemic vulnerability and precision care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- N-myc and STAT interactor is a novel biomarker for predicting the severity and clinical outcome of sepsis: a prospective research.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- A nomogram for the prediction of response to anti-CGRP mAbs: the CGRP score.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Serum proteomes and their prognostic values in sepsis patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit: a single-center study using SWATH-MS proteomics.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- Performance of Early Sepsis Screening Tools for Timely Diagnosis and Antibiotic Stewardship in a Resource-Limited Thai Community Hospital.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning model for prediction of 28-day all-cause mortality in immunocompromised patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study based on MIMIC-IV database.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- A Simplified Immune-Dysregulation Index (IL-6/LY) as a Robust Predictor of 28-Day In-Hospital Mortality and MODS in Patients with Sepsis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Article
- Correlation of Serum Albumin Levels With the Severity of Sepsis Among Intensive Care Unit Patients.Cureus · 2024Article
- Association Between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Sepsis Severity in ICU Patients.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive review navigates the intricate landscape of sepsis scoring systems, aiming to provide healthcare professionals and researchers with a nuanced understanding of their role in contemporary sepsis management. Beginning with a succinct overview of sepsis, the review emphasizes the significance of scoring systems in standardizing assessments and guiding clinical decision-making. Through a detailed analysis of prominent systems such as SOFA, APACHE, and qSOFA, the review delineates their unique attributes, strengths, and limitations. The implications for sepsis management and patient outcomes are discussed, highlighting the potential for these tools to enhance early detection and intervention. The review concludes with a compelling call to action, urging healthcare professionals to integrate scoring systems into routine practice and researchers to explore novel approaches. By synthesizing current knowledge and addressing future directions, this review serves as a valuable resource for those seeking clarity and guidance in the dynamic landscape of sepsis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.