ReviewCureus2024
Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma: An Emerging Novel Biological Cure for Low Back Pain?
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Axial Spine Pain of Facet Joint Origin.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Pooled it
- The clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with platelet-rich plasma injection for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Subacute and Chronic Low-Back Pain: From MRI Phenotype to Imaging-Guided Interventions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Long-Term Effectiveness of Intradiscal Culture-Expanded Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) with Platelet Products for Discogenic Low Back Pain.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have emerged as a new biological intervention for many musculoskeletal conditions, such as low back pain (LBP), and have garnered significant attention in recent research endeavors. The recognition of PRP's use is progressively growing; nonetheless, comprehensive clinical validation is required to establish its uses and efficiency. This article offers a thorough evaluation regarding the assurance as well as the efficacy of PRP therapy in the management of low back pain. It specifically focuses on the analysis of clinical trials undertaken in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.