Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38481670›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2024

Incidental prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: Critical analysis of independent risk factors and impact on surgical outcomes.

Joao G Porto, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Tarek Ajami, Mohamadhusni Zarli, Ryan Chen, Thiago Furtado, Robert Marcovich, Dipen J Parekh, Hemendra N Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rates of incidental prostate cancer following HoLEP Can it be predicted preoperatively?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joao G PortoDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-1054
Ruben Blachman-BraunDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9700-0805
Tarek AjamiDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami Miami Florida USA.
Mohamadhusni ZarliDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine Nova Southeastern University Fort Lauderdale Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2904-2047
Ryan ChenDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami Miami Florida USA.
Thiago FurtadoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil.
Robert MarcovichDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami Miami Florida USA.
Dipen J ParekhDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami Miami Florida USA.
Hemendra N ShahDesai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-5502
University of Miami · USFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais · BRNova Southeastern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study are to evaluate the impact of incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) and its different grade group (GG) on the surgical outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and, furthermore, to assess the independent risk factors associated with the detection of iPCa. Patients or materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single institution for HoLEP cases that were performed between 2017 and 2022. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of prostate cancer and those without baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels within 1 year were excluded. Four hundred seventeen patients were divided into three groups: benign prostatic hyperplasia-377; clinically insignificant (GG 1)-29; and clinically significant prostate cancer (GG 2-5)-11. The preoperative parameters analysed included age, body mass index, race/ethnicity, use of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, PSA, prostate size, PSA density, and history of negative prostate biopsy. To evaluate the association between clinical and demographic variables, a multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed. We also assessed intraoperative and post-operative outcomes among these three groups. Results: A total of 417 patients were analysed; 40 (9.6%) patients had iPCa, of which 29 (72.5%) and 11 (27.5%) were clinically nonsignificant and significant prostate cancer, respectively. Of all the demographic and preoperative variables analysed, hypertension was significantly associated with overall prostate cancer diagnosis ( Conclusion: The rate of iPCa after HoLEP was 9.6%, with most cases being GG 1 (72.5%) and managed through active surveillance. Age, prostate size, baseline PSA, and prior negative prostate biopsies were not associated with increased risk of iPCa.

Indexed as

active surveillancebenign prostatic hyperplasiaholmium laser enucleation of the prostateincidental prostate cancerlower tract urinary symptoms

Identifiers

PMID38481670
PMCPMC10927913
OpenAlexW4388081963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.